Review a plan with Critic

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

Use when reviewing code changes before committing, after implementing features, or when asked to review. Triggers on staged changes, PR reviews, or explicit review requests.

Process and implement code review feedback systematically. Use when user provides reviewer comments, PR feedback, code review notes, or asks to implement suggestions from reviews.

Use when working with comprehensive review full review

Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review

Schema for tracking code review outcomes to enable feedback-driven skill improvement. Use when logging review results or analyzing review quality.

Mandatory verification steps for all code reviews to reduce false positives. Load this skill before reporting ANY code review findings.

Analyzes feedback logs to identify patterns and suggest improvements to review skills. Use when you have accumulated feedback data and want to improve review accuracy.

Centralizes persona-driven code reviews (Fowler, Torvalds, Carmack, React core, etc.) so Claude can pick or combine expert viewpoints when the user asks for a code review or perspective-specific critique.

Performs comprehensive code reviews focusing on correctness, maintainability, performance, security, and best practices. Trigger keywords: review, code review, PR review, pull request, check code,...

Interactive Intent approval. Review sections and mark status (locked/reviewed/draft). Use /intent-review <path> to review a specific file, or /intent-review to review Intent in current directory.

The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards, and building cultureUse when "code review, PR review, pull request, merge...

Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims,...

Code review specialist for quality standards, design patterns, security review, and constructive feedbackUse when "code review, pull request, PR review, code quality, refactor, technical debt,...

Reviews pull requests and code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use when user asks for code review, PR review, or mentions reviewing changes.

Assesses and responds to incoming code review feedback on PRs (reviewer comments, requested changes), especially when suggestions are unclear, technically questionable, or scope-expanding. Use...

Use when working with comprehensive review full review

Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review

Local code review comparing branches/diffs without GitHub integration. Use when the user wants to review their code, self-review changes, check for bugs before committing, or mentions code review,...