Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
5473
(37.1ms)
13 / 274
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Review identity and access management using NIST SP 800-63B guidelines with MFA enforcement, password policy, and least privilege validation.
ad-security-reviewer
0.00
Use when user needs Active Directory security analysis, privileged group design review, authentication policy assessment, or delegation and attack surface evaluation across enterprise domains.
get-review-theme
0.00
从任意输入源提取结构化综述主题：支持文件（PDF/Word/Markdown/Tex）、文件夹、图片、自然语言描述、网页 URL 等；自动识别输入类型并提取内容；生成"主题+关键词+核心问题"结构化输出，可直接用于 systematic-literature-review 及其他文献综述技能。
code-review-pro
0.00
Senior Code Architect & Quality Assurance Engineer for 2026. Specialized in context-aware AI code reviews, automated PR auditing, and technical debt mitigation. Expert in neutralizing "AI-Smells,"...
clean-code-reviewer
0.00
Analyze code quality based on "Clean Code" principles. Identify naming, function size, duplication, over-engineering, and magic number issues with severity ratings and refactoring suggestions. Use...
文档一致性审核官，检查代码实现与文档说明的一致性。当用户请求审查文档与代码的一致性、检查 README/docs 是否过时、验证 API 文档准确性时使用此技能。适用于：(1) 审查 README 与实现一致性 (2) 检查 docs/ 目录文档是否过时 (3) 验证 API/配置文档准确性 (4) 生成文档一致性报告。触发词包括：文档审查、doc...
reviewing-ai-papers
0.00
Analyze AI/ML technical content (papers, articles, blog posts) and extract actionable insights filtered through enterprise AI engineering lens. Use when user provides URL/document for AI/ML...