Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not...
Review identity and access management using NIST SP 800-63B guidelines with MFA enforcement, password policy, and least privilege validation.
Use when user needs Active Directory security analysis, privileged group design review, authentication policy assessment, or delegation and attack surface evaluation across enterprise domains.
从任意输入源提取结构化综述主题:支持文件(PDF/Word/Markdown/Tex)、文件夹、图片、自然语言描述、网页 URL 等;自动识别输入类型并提取内容;生成"主题+关键词+核心问题"结构化输出,可直接用于 systematic-literature-review 及其他文献综述技能。
Senior Code Architect & Quality Assurance Engineer for 2026. Specialized in context-aware AI code reviews, automated PR auditing, and technical debt mitigation. Expert in neutralizing "AI-Smells,"...
Analyze code quality based on "Clean Code" principles. Identify naming, function size, duplication, over-engineering, and magic number issues with severity ratings and refactoring suggestions. Use...
文档一致性审核官,检查代码实现与文档说明的一致性。当用户请求审查文档与代码的一致性、检查 README/docs 是否过时、验证 API 文档准确性时使用此技能。适用于:(1) 审查 README 与实现一致性 (2) 检查 docs/ 目录文档是否过时 (3) 验证 API/配置文档准确性 (4) 生成文档一致性报告。触发词包括:文档审查、doc...
Analyze AI/ML technical content (papers, articles, blog posts) and extract actionable insights filtered through enterprise AI engineering lens. Use when user provides URL/document for AI/ML...