existential-birds

go-code-review

15
2
# Install this skill:
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill "go-code-review"

Install specific skill from multi-skill repository

# Description

Reviews Go code for idiomatic patterns, error handling, concurrency safety, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .go files, checking error handling, goroutine usage, or interface design.

# SKILL.md


name: go-code-review
description: Reviews Go code for idiomatic patterns, error handling, concurrency safety, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .go files, checking error handling, goroutine usage, or interface design.


Go Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue Type Reference
Missing error checks, wrapped errors references/error-handling.md
Race conditions, channel misuse references/concurrency.md
Interface pollution, naming references/interfaces.md
Resource leaks, defer misuse references/common-mistakes.md

Review Checklist

  • [ ] All errors are checked (no _ = err)
  • [ ] Errors wrapped with context (fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err))
  • [ ] Resources closed with defer immediately after creation
  • [ ] No goroutine leaks (channels closed, contexts canceled)
  • [ ] Interfaces defined by consumers, not producers
  • [ ] Interface names end in -er (Reader, Writer, Handler)
  • [ ] Exported names have doc comments
  • [ ] No naked returns in functions > 5 lines
  • [ ] Context passed as first parameter
  • [ ] Mutexes protect shared state, not methods

When to Load References

  • Reviewing error return patterns → error-handling.md
  • Reviewing goroutines/channels → concurrency.md
  • Reviewing type definitions → interfaces.md
  • General Go review → common-mistakes.md

Review Questions

  1. Are all error returns checked and wrapped?
  2. Are goroutines properly managed with context cancellation?
  3. Are resources (files, connections) closed with defer?
  4. Are interfaces minimal and defined where used?

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These patterns are acceptable and should NOT be flagged as issues:

  • _ = err with reason comment - Intentionally ignored errors with explanation
    go _ = conn.Close() // Best effort cleanup, already handling primary error
  • Empty interface interface{} - For truly generic code (pre-generics codebases)
  • Naked returns in short functions - Acceptable in functions < 5 lines with named returns
  • Channel without close - When consumer stops via context cancellation, not channel close
  • Mutex protecting struct fields - Even if accessed only via methods, this is correct encapsulation
  • //nolint directives with reason - Acceptable when accompanied by explanation
    go //nolint:errcheck // Error logged but not returned per API contract
  • Defer in loop - When function scope cleanup is intentional (e.g., processing files in batches)

Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag these issues when the specific conditions apply:

Issue Flag ONLY IF
Missing error check Error return is actionable (can retry, log, or propagate)
Goroutine leak No context cancellation path exists for the goroutine
Missing defer Resource isn't explicitly closed before next acquisition or return
Interface pollution Interface has > 1 method AND only one consumer exists

Before Submitting Findings

Load and follow review-verification-protocol before reporting any issue.

# Supported AI Coding Agents

This skill is compatible with the SKILL.md standard and works with all major AI coding agents:

Learn more about the SKILL.md standard and how to use these skills with your preferred AI coding agent.