name: writing-skills
description: Guides creation and editing of SKILL.md files following Anthropic best practices and this repo's conventions. Use when creating a new skill, editing an existing skill, porting a skill from another source, or reviewing skill quality. Triggers on "create skill", "new skill", "write skill", "edit skill", "improve skill", or any work that adds or modifies files under skills/.

Writing Skills

Overview

A skill is a SKILL.md file that teaches an AI agent a specific technique, workflow, or discipline. This skill defines how to write them well — with proper naming, trigger-rich descriptions, tested content, and no bloat.

Skill Structure

skills/
  skill-name/
    SKILL.md              # Required — the skill itself
    supporting-file.md    # Optional — only for heavy reference (100+ lines)

Every skill is a single folder under skills/ containing a SKILL.md with YAML frontmatter.

SKILL.md Format

---
name: skill-name-in-gerund-form
description: [WHAT it does] + [WHEN to use it]. Be specific about triggers.
---

# Skill Title

## Overview
Core principle in 1-2 sentences.

## [Core content — rules, patterns, workflow]

## Red Flags — STOP
Table of rationalizations and correct actions.

## Anti-Patterns
Common mistakes to avoid.

Naming Rules

Use gerund form (verb + -ing) per Anthropic guidelines:

Hard constraints:
- Lowercase letters, numbers, and hyphens only
- Maximum 64 characters
- Cannot contain anthropic or claude
- Folder name must match the name field

Writing the Description

The description field is the only thing Claude sees before deciding to load your skill. It must include:

1. WHAT the skill does (third person): "Reviews code changes for bugs..."
2. WHEN to use it: "Use when reviewing PRs, before committing..."
3. Trigger keywords users would naturally say: "commit", "review", "fix comments"

# GOOD — specific triggers, clear purpose
description: Reviews code changes for bugs, performance issues, and security problems. Use when reviewing PRs, before committing, or when user asks to review or check code.

# BAD — vague, no triggers
description: Helps with code quality.

# BAD — describes workflow (Claude will shortcut the body)
description: Fetches PR, groups comments, presents summary, lets user select fixes.

Critical: Never summarize the skill's workflow in the description. Claude may follow the description shortcut instead of reading the full skill body.

What NOT to Include

• No installation section — skills auto-discover via the description field
• No "When to Use" body section — this belongs in the description (body loads AFTER triggering)
• No README or changelog — keep it to SKILL.md and optional reference files
• No hook setup — hooks are a separate system, not part of skills

Checklist Before Done

1. Name is gerund form, hyphens only, matches folder name
2. Description includes WHAT + WHEN + trigger keywords, under 1024 chars
3. Content is self-contained, concise, actionable
4. No installation section, no "When to Use" body section
5. Tested with a clean subagent — does the agent understand and follow the skill correctly?
6. Committed with gitmoji conventional commit (see committing-code skill — it handles README/AGENTS.md update checks)

Testing with a Subagent

Before marking a skill as done, launch a test subagent:

Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose":
  "Read [skill path] and evaluate:
  1. Description quality (WHAT + WHEN + triggers, third person, <1024 chars)
  2. Naming (gerund form)
  3. No installation section
  4. Completeness — any gaps?
  5. Token efficiency — any redundancy?"

Use model=haiku for fast, cheap testing. Fix issues found, then commit.

Token Budget

Skills should be concise — every token counts when loaded into context:

• Aim for under 300 lines for most skills
• Use tables over prose for reference data
• Cut redundancy between Red Flags and Anti-Patterns sections
• Reference other skills by name instead of repeating their content