name: problem-solving
description: Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for marketing challenges including campaign complexity (simplification cascades), creative blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring campaign patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), audience scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from proven problem-solving frameworks adapted for marketing execution.

Marketing Problem-Solving

Systematic techniques for solving complex marketing challenges, breaking through creative blocks, and optimizing campaigns.

Language & Quality Standards

CRITICAL: Respond in the same language the user is using. If Vietnamese, respond in Vietnamese. If Spanish, respond in Spanish.

Standards: Token efficiency, sacrifice grammar for concision, list unresolved questions at end.

When to Use This Skill

Apply problem-solving techniques when facing:
- Campaign Complexity Spirals - Campaign keeps adding features/channels, becoming unwieldy
- Creative Innovation Blocks - Stuck in conventional approaches, need breakthrough ideas
- Recurring Campaign Patterns - Same issues appearing across multiple campaigns
- Assumption Constraints - Limited by industry "truths" or conventional wisdom
- Audience Scale Uncertainty - Unclear how strategy scales from niche to mass market
- General Stuckness - Progress halted, unclear how to move forward

Core Techniques

1. Simplification Cascades

Problem: Campaign complexity spiraling out of control

When to use:
- Campaign has too many channels, messages, or touchpoints
- Team overwhelmed by execution complexity
- Budget spread too thin across tactics
- Message diluted across too many variations

How it works:
1. List all campaign elements (channels, messages, segments, assets)
2. Identify the 20% that drives 80% of results
3. Ruthlessly cut the rest
4. Reassess and repeat if still complex

Marketing example:

Problem: Product launch campaign across 8 channels, 15 assets, 4 segments
↓ Simplification Round 1
Focus: Top 3 channels (email, LinkedIn, blog), 6 core assets, 2 key segments
↓ Simplification Round 2
Core: Email + LinkedIn, 3 assets (landing page, case study, email sequence), 1 primary segment
Result: Focused execution, better results, manageable workload

See: ./references/simplification-cascades.md

2. Collision-Zone Thinking

Problem: Creative blocks, conventional approaches not working

When to use:
- Campaign ideas feel generic or uninspired
- Competitor campaigns all look similar
- Need differentiation and breakthrough positioning
- Stuck in industry best practices that don't work

How it works:
1. Identify two unrelated domains/industries
2. Force collision: "What if [industry A] met [industry B]?"
3. Extract unexpected insights
4. Apply to your marketing challenge

Marketing example:

Challenge: B2B SaaS email campaign feels boring
Collision: "What if enterprise software marketing met sneaker drops?"
Insights: Scarcity, hype, exclusive access, community building
Application: Limited beta access campaign, waitlist with perks, exclusive Slack community
Result: 3x higher engagement, viral social sharing

See: ./references/collision-zone-thinking.md

3. Meta-Pattern Recognition

Problem: Same issues recurring across campaigns

When to use:
- Different campaigns failing in similar ways
- Repeated performance issues across channels
- Team making same mistakes
- Need to identify root cause vs symptoms

How it works:
1. Document 3+ instances of similar failures
2. Look for deeper pattern beneath surface issues
3. Address root cause, not symptoms
4. Create system to prevent recurrence

Marketing example:

Surface problems:
- Email campaign: Low open rates
- Social campaign: Low engagement
- Content campaign: Low traffic

Meta-pattern discovered: Weak audience understanding
Root cause: No buyer persona research or validation
Solution: Comprehensive persona development process
Prevention: Mandatory persona validation before any campaign

See: ./references/meta-pattern-recognition.md

4. Inversion Exercise

Problem: Constrained by industry assumptions or "best practices"

When to use:
- Conventional approaches failing
- Industry "rules" limiting creativity
- Need to challenge assumptions
- Market leader doing opposite of conventional wisdom

How it works:
1. State current assumption: "We must do X"
2. Invert it: "What if we did the opposite of X?"
3. Explore inverted scenario seriously
4. Identify valid insights from inversion

Marketing example:

Assumption: "We must build email list before launching"
Inversion: "What if we launched with zero email list?"
Exploration: Focus on virality, referrals, paid acquisition, partnerships
Insight: Email list might be vanity metric; focus on product-led growth
Result: Skip content marketing, invest in product experience and referral program

See: ./references/inversion-exercise.md

5. Scale Game

Problem: Uncertain how strategy scales across audience sizes

When to use:
- Unclear if niche strategy works at scale
- Planning market expansion
- Pivot from early adopters to mainstream
- Budget allocation across segments uncertain

How it works:
1. Test strategy at 10x smaller scale
2. Test strategy at 10x larger scale
3. Identify what breaks at each scale
4. Design for actual scale, not current size

Marketing example:

Current: 100 customers via founder-led sales

10x smaller (10 customers):
- Works: Personal outreach, custom demos, high-touch
- Breaks: Can't justify any paid marketing

10x larger (1,000 customers):
- Works: Content marketing, paid ads, self-service onboarding
- Breaks: Founder-led sales, custom demos

10x larger again (10,000 customers):
- Works: Product-led growth, brand awareness, partnerships
- Breaks: Content marketing bandwidth, ad costs unsustainable

Insight: At 100→1,000, invest in content + paid ads + self-service
Don't optimize for 10 or 10,000; build for 1,000

See: ./references/scale-game.md

6. When Stuck Protocol

Problem: Progress completely halted, don't know next step

When to use:
- Campaign stalled with no clear path forward
- Team disagrees on approach
- Overwhelmed by options or complexity
- Decision paralysis

How it works:
1. Zoom out: What's the actual goal? (Often forgot amid tactics)
2. Constraint: What if you had 1 day and $100? (Forces prioritization)
3. Naïve question: What would a beginner do? (Often surprisingly insightful)
4. Ship smallest: What's the absolute minimum to test hypothesis?

Marketing example:

Stuck: Launching new product, paralyzed by marketing plan complexity

Zoom out: Goal = validate market demand + get 10 paying customers

Constraint: 1 day + $100 budget
- Can't build full funnel
- Can't create 50 assets
- Focus: Simple landing page + $100 LinkedIn ads

Naïve approach: "Just tell people about it"
- Direct outreach to 50 ideal customers
- Simple email explaining value

Ship smallest: Landing page + email to 50 prospects + $100 ads
Result: 3 sales in week 1, validated demand, iterate from there

See: ./references/when-stuck.md

Problem-Solving Workflow

Step 1: Identify Problem Type

• Complexity spiral? → Simplification Cascades
• Creative block? → Collision-Zone Thinking
• Recurring pattern? → Meta-Pattern Recognition
• Assumption constraint? → Inversion Exercise
• Scale uncertainty? → Scale Game
• Completely stuck? → When Stuck Protocol

Step 2: Apply Technique

• Follow structured process for chosen technique
• Document insights and findings
• Validate assumptions with data/research

Step 3: Implement Solution

• Create action plan from insights
• Test solution at small scale first
• Measure results and iterate

Step 4: Capture Learning

• Document problem + solution for future reference
• Share with team to build knowledge base
• Update campaign playbooks with insights

Integration with Marketing Workflow

Use problem-solving techniques at these key moments:

Planning Phase:
- Scale Game: Validate strategy for target audience size
- Inversion Exercise: Challenge conventional approaches

Execution Phase:
- Simplification Cascades: Cut scope when overwhelmed
- When Stuck Protocol: Unblock campaign development

Optimization Phase:
- Meta-Pattern Recognition: Identify recurring issues
- Collision-Zone Thinking: Generate breakthrough ideas

Review Phase:
- Document learnings for future campaigns
- Update problem-solving playbook

Reference Materials

All techniques detailed in ./references/:
- simplification-cascades.md - Reducing campaign complexity
- collision-zone-thinking.md - Breaking creative blocks
- meta-pattern-recognition.md - Finding root causes
- inversion-exercise.md - Challenging assumptions
- scale-game.md - Planning for audience scale
- when-stuck.md - Unblocking progress
- attribution.md - Framework origins and credits

Quick Reference

Complexity overwhelm? → Simplification Cascades (cut to 20% that matters)
Creative stuck? → Collision-Zone Thinking (force unexpected combinations)
Same problems repeating? → Meta-Pattern Recognition (find root cause)
Best practices failing? → Inversion Exercise (try opposite approach)
Scaling unclear? → Scale Game (test at 10x/0.1x scale)
Completely blocked? → When Stuck Protocol (zoom out, constrain, ship smallest)

Remember: These techniques are tools, not rules. Mix and combine as needed. The goal is breakthrough thinking and unblocked execution, not perfect methodology.