Charon-Fan

code-reviewer

4
1
# Install this skill:
npx skills add Charon-Fan/agent-playbook --skill "code-reviewer"

Install specific skill from multi-skill repository

# Description

Reviews pull requests and code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use when user asks for code review, PR review, or mentions reviewing changes.

# SKILL.md


name: code-reviewer
description: Reviews pull requests and code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use when user asks for code review, PR review, or mentions reviewing changes.
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, WebFetch, WebSearch
metadata:
hooks:
after_complete:
- trigger: self-improving-agent
mode: background
reason: "Learn from review patterns"
- trigger: session-logger
mode: auto
reason: "Log review activity"


Code Reviewer

A comprehensive code review skill that analyzes pull requests and code changes for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices.

When This Skill Activates

This skill activates when you:
- Ask for a code review
- Request a PR review
- Mention reviewing changes
- Say "review this" or "check this code"

Review Process

Phase 1: Context Gathering

  1. Get changed files
    bash git diff main...HEAD --name-only git log main...HEAD --oneline

  2. Get the diff
    bash git diff main...HEAD

  3. Understand project context

  4. Read relevant documentation
  5. Check existing patterns in similar files
  6. Identify project-specific conventions

Phase 2: Analysis Categories

1. Correctness

  • [ ] Logic is sound and matches requirements
  • [ ] Edge cases are handled
  • [ ] Error handling is appropriate
  • [ ] No obvious bugs or typos

2. Security

  • [ ] No hardcoded secrets or credentials
  • [ ] Input validation and sanitization
  • [ ] SQL injection prevention
  • [ ] XSS prevention (for frontend)
  • [ ] Authentication/authorization checks
  • [ ] Safe handling of user data

3. Performance

  • [ ] No N+1 queries
  • [ ] Appropriate caching
  • [ ] Efficient algorithms
  • [ ] No unnecessary computations
  • [ ] Memory efficiency

4. Code Quality

  • [ ] Follows DRY principle
  • [ ] Follows KISS principle
  • [ ] Appropriate abstractions
  • [ ] Clear naming conventions
  • [ ] Proper typing (if TypeScript)
  • [ ] No commented-out code

5. Testing

  • [ ] Tests cover new functionality
  • [ ] Tests cover edge cases
  • [ ] Test assertions are meaningful
  • [ ] No brittle tests

6. Documentation

  • [ ] Complex logic is explained
  • [ ] Public APIs have documentation
  • [ ] JSDoc/TSDoc for functions
  • [ ] README updated if needed

7. Maintainability

  • [ ] Code is readable
  • [ ] Consistent style
  • [ ] Modular design
  • [ ] Separation of concerns

Phase 3: Output Format

Use this structured format for review feedback:

# Code Review

## Summary
Brief overview of the changes (2-3 sentences).

## Issues by Severity

### Critical
Must fix before merge.

- [ ] **Issue Title**: Description with file:line reference

### High
Should fix before merge unless there's a good reason.

- [ ] **Issue Title**: Description with file:line reference

### Medium
Consider fixing, can be done in follow-up.

- [ ] **Issue Title**: Description with file:line reference

### Low
Nice to have improvements.

- [ ] **Issue Title**: Description with file:line reference

## Positive Highlights
What was done well in this PR.

## Suggestions
Optional improvements that don't require immediate action.

## Approval Status
- [ ] Approved
- [ ] Approved with suggestions
- [ ] Request changes

Common Issues to Check

Security Issues

Issue Pattern Recommendation
Hardcoded secrets const API_KEY = "sk-" Use environment variables
SQL injection \"SELECT * FROM...\" + user_input Use parameterized queries
XSS vulnerability innerHTML = user_input Sanitize or use textContent
Missing auth check New endpoint without @RequireAuth Add authentication middleware

Performance Issues

Issue Pattern Recommendation
N+1 query Loop with database call Use eager loading or batch queries
Unnecessary re-render Missing dependencies in useEffect Fix dependency array
Memory leak Event listener not removed Add cleanup in useEffect return
Inefficient loop Nested loops O(n²) Consider hash map or different algorithm

Code Quality Issues

Issue Pattern Recommendation
Duplicate code Similar blocks repeated Extract to function
Magic number if (status === 5) Use named constant
Long function Function >50 lines Split into smaller functions
Complex condition a && b || c && d Extract to variable with descriptive name

Testing Issues

Issue Pattern Recommendation
No tests New feature without test file Add unit tests
Untested edge case Test only covers happy path Add edge case tests
Brittle test Test relies on implementation details Test behavior, not implementation
Missing assertion Test doesn't assert anything Add proper assertions

Language-Specific Guidelines

TypeScript

  • Use unknown instead of any for untyped values
  • Prefer interface for public APIs, type for unions
  • Use strict mode settings
  • Avoid as assertions when possible

React

  • Follow Hooks rules
  • Use useCallback/useMemo appropriately (not prematurely)
  • Prefer function components
  • Use proper key props in lists
  • Avoid prop drilling with Context

Python

  • Follow PEP 8 style guide
  • Use type hints
  • Use f-strings for formatting
  • Prefer list comprehensions over map/filter
  • Use context managers for resources

Go

  • Handle errors explicitly
  • Use named returns for clarity
  • Keep goroutines simple
  • Use channels for communication
  • Avoid package-level state

Before Approving

Confirm the following:
- [ ] All critical issues are addressed
- [ ] Tests pass locally
- [ ] No merge conflicts
- [ ] Commit messages are clear
- [ ] Documentation is updated
- [ ] Breaking changes are documented

Scripts

Run the review checklist script:

python scripts/review_checklist.py <pr-number>

References

  • references/checklist.md - Complete review checklist
  • references/security.md - Security review guidelines
  • references/patterns.md - Common patterns and anti-patterns

# Supported AI Coding Agents

This skill is compatible with the SKILL.md standard and works with all major AI coding agents:

Learn more about the SKILL.md standard and how to use these skills with your preferred AI coding agent.