Refactor high-complexity React components in Dify frontend. Use when `pnpm analyze-component...
npx skills add liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus --skill "building-a-promotion-case"
Install specific skill from multi-skill repository
# Description
Build a promotion case and produce a Promotion Case Pack (target role + timeline, ladder mapping, evidence log, impact narrative, manager alignment plan, sponsor/visibility map, submission-ready promo doc). Use for promotion packet, getting promoted, leveling up, career ladder, promotion committee. Category: Career.
# SKILL.md
name: "building-a-promotion-case"
description: "Build a promotion case and produce a Promotion Case Pack (target role + timeline, ladder mapping, evidence log, impact narrative, manager alignment plan, sponsor/visibility map, submission-ready promo doc). Use for promotion packet, getting promoted, leveling up, career ladder, promotion committee. Category: Career."
Building a Promotion Case
Scope
Covers
- Turning “I want a promotion” into a concrete promotion thesis tied to company priorities
- Mapping your work to the next-level expectations (career ladder / competency model)
- Building an evidence-backed impact log (metrics + artifacts + stakeholder proof)
- Creating a submission-ready promotion doc (one-pager + appendix) that makes the decision easy
- Aligning with your manager using a partnership loop (a.k.a. “Magic Loop”) and planning the next 4–12 weeks
- Building a lightweight sponsor/visibility plan (political capital without being sleazy)
When to use
- “Help me write a promotion packet / promotion doc.”
- “I need a promotion case that maps to our career ladder.”
- “I want to get promoted this cycle—what should I do and how do I prove it?”
- “My manager says ‘keep doing what you’re doing’—I need crisp promotion criteria and a plan.”
- “I want to level up, but I’m not sure what evidence counts.”
When NOT to use
- You need compensation negotiation tactics for a new offer (this pack is about internal promotion readiness, not external offers)
- You are in an HR/performance escalation (PIP, investigation, termination risk) — involve HR/manager process first
- You don’t want to involve your manager at all (promotion decisions are manager- and org-mediated; this pack assumes partnership)
- You only need a resume/LinkedIn rewrite (use a resume-focused workflow instead)
Inputs
Minimum required
- Your role + scope today (team, product area, what you own)
- Target level/role and timing (desired promo cycle/date)
- Your company’s leveling rubric / ladder (or a description of expectations if you can’t share the doc)
- 3–8 work examples from the last 6–12 months (projects, launches, decisions, cross-functional leadership)
- Evidence signals (metrics, customer outcomes, reliability, revenue/cost, quality, speed, adoption)
- Stakeholders involved (manager, partners, potential sponsors, promo committee style if known)
Missing-info strategy
- Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
- If the ladder/process is unclear, proceed with a generic ladder mapping and label assumptions for the user to correct.
- Don’t request confidential/PII; use anonymized numbers and redacted descriptions.
Outputs (deliverables)
Produce a Promotion Case Pack (Markdown in-chat; or as files if requested) in this order:
1) Promotion thesis + target role/timeline (what you’re asking for, why now)
2) Next-level expectations map (ladder/competencies → what “good” looks like)
3) Evidence log (impact table with metrics + artifacts + stakeholders)
4) Competency mapping (claims → evidence; gaps → plan)
5) Impact narrative (1-page story + “company problem solved” framing)
6) Manager alignment plan (“Magic Loop”) (asks, commitments, check-ins, decision criteria)
7) Sponsor/visibility map (who needs to believe what; how you’ll socialize)
8) Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always)
Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md
Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md
Workflow (8 steps)
1) Intake + promotion process snapshot
- Inputs: user context; references/INTAKE.md.
- Actions: Confirm the goal (promotion vs broader career planning). Capture timing, process, and decision-makers. Identify constraints (confidentiality, limited metrics, org politics).
- Outputs: Promotion context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list.
- Checks: Target level and promo window are explicit; boundaries are respected.
2) Define the promotion thesis (make the decision easy)
- Inputs: company priorities; your work themes; target level expectations.
- Actions: Draft a 1–2 sentence thesis: “Promote me to X because I already operate at X by doing Y which solves Z.” Tie to a concrete company problem.
- Outputs: Promotion thesis + 3–5 proof points (bullets).
- Checks: Thesis is falsifiable and specific (not “I worked hard”).
3) Map next-level expectations (promotion ≠ career, but they should align)
- Inputs: ladder/rubric (or proxy); target role definition.
- Actions: Translate the ladder into a small set of competencies and “next-level signals.” Separate: (a) table stakes, (b) differentiators, (c) visibility/scope expectations.
- Outputs: Expectations map + initial gap list.
- Checks: Each competency has observable behaviors; gaps are concrete.
4) Build an evidence log (receipts, not vibes)
- Inputs: 3–8 work examples; available metrics; artifacts.
- Actions: Create an evidence table that captures: problem, your role, scope, decisions, outcomes, metrics/proxies, and partners. Identify where you need stakeholder quotes.
- Outputs: Evidence log + “evidence missing” list.
- Checks: Each major claim has at least 2 evidence types (metric/proxy + artifact/partner proof).
5) Convert evidence into a promotion doc draft (one-pager + appendix)
- Inputs: thesis, expectations map, evidence log.
- Actions: Draft the promo doc using the template. Write in exec-friendly language: impact, scope, leadership, leverage, and why you’re low-risk at the next level.
- Outputs: Promotion doc draft + appendix (evidence snippets).
- Checks: The doc is skimmable in 3 minutes; every claim has a pointer to evidence.
6) Manager alignment loop (“Magic Loop”) + criteria agreement
- Inputs: draft doc; manager context; promo process.
- Actions: Create a plan to align with your manager: ask what would make them confident, commit to what they ask, and schedule check-ins. Draft your “ask” script and the next 4–12 week plan.
- Outputs: Manager alignment plan + 1:1 agenda/script.
- Checks: Manager expectations are explicit; next check-in date is scheduled; you’ve made it easy to sponsor you.
7) Sponsor/visibility plan (politics as logistics)
- Inputs: stakeholder map; known promo committee dynamics.
- Actions: Identify 3–8 people whose belief matters. Plan how you will: (a) increase visibility of outcomes, (b) request feedback/endorsements, (c) avoid surprises.
- Outputs: Sponsor/visibility map + outreach templates.
- Checks: Every key stakeholder has a specific next action and a low-friction ask.
8) Quality gate + finalize
- Inputs: full pack draft.
- Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Tighten weak sections. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps. Produce a submission-ready doc and a short “manager email” version.
- Outputs: Final Promotion Case Pack.
- Checks: Pack is evidence-based, ladder-aligned, and process-ready; risks and unknowns are explicit.
Quality gate (required)
- Use references/CHECKLISTS.md and references/RUBRIC.md.
- Always include: Risks, Open questions, Next steps.
Examples
Example 1 (typical): “I’m a Senior PM and want to get promoted to Staff PM in the next cycle (May). Here’s our ladder excerpt and 5 projects I led. Build a promotion case doc + evidence log + manager alignment plan.”
Expected: Promotion Case Pack with a ladder-mapped narrative and concrete manager check-ins.
Example 2 (limited metrics): “I’m a PM on an internal platform team. My impact is hard to measure. Help me build a promotion case using proxy metrics, stakeholder evidence, and artifacts.”
Expected: Evidence log with proxies (cycle time, reliability, adoption, internal NPS) and explicit proof pointers.
Boundary example: “My manager refuses to discuss promotions and HR is involved in a performance process.”
Response: recommend following HR/manager process first; offer to help later with evidence capture, role expectations, and a future readiness plan.
# Supported AI Coding Agents
This skill is compatible with the SKILL.md standard and works with all major AI coding agents:
Learn more about the SKILL.md standard and how to use these skills with your preferred AI coding agent.