Implement GitOps workflows with ArgoCD and Flux for automated, declarative Kubernetes...
npx skills add acedergren/oci-agent-skills --skill "OCI Best Practices and Architecture"
Install specific skill from multi-skill repository
# Description
Use when architecting OCI solutions, migrating from AWS/Azure, designing multi-AD deployments, or avoiding common OCI anti-patterns. Covers VCN sizing mistakes, Cloud Guard gotchas, free tier specifics, OCI terminology confusion, and multi-AD patterns. Keywords: VCN CIDR too small, compartment strategy, security list vs NSG, regional subnet, always-free limits.
# SKILL.md
name: OCI Best Practices and Architecture
description: Use when architecting OCI solutions, migrating from AWS/Azure, designing multi-AD deployments, or avoiding common OCI anti-patterns. Covers VCN sizing mistakes, Cloud Guard gotchas, free tier specifics, OCI terminology confusion, and multi-AD patterns. Keywords: VCN CIDR too small, compartment strategy, security list vs NSG, regional subnet, always-free limits.
version: 2.0.0
OCI Best Practices - Expert Knowledge
🏗️ Use OCI Landing Zone Terraform Modules
Don't reinvent the wheel. Use oracle-terraform-modules/landing-zone for OCI architecture.
Landing Zone solves:
- ❌ Bad Practice #1: Generic compartments (Landing Zone provides hierarchical Network/Security/Workloads structure)
- ❌ Bad Practice #2: Administrator for daily ops (Landing Zone enforces least-privilege IAM policies)
- ❌ Bad Practice #4: Poor network segmentation (Landing Zone implements hub-spoke topology with security zones)
- ❌ Bad Practice #8: Creating your own Terraform modules (Landing Zone provides battle-tested, Oracle-maintained, CIS-certified modules)
This skill provides: OCI-specific anti-patterns, architecture patterns, and operational knowledge for resources deployed WITHIN a Landing Zone.
⚠️ OCI CLI/API Knowledge Gap
You don't know OCI CLI commands or OCI API structure.
Your training data has limited and outdated knowledge of:
- OCI CLI syntax and parameters (updates monthly)
- OCI API endpoints and request/response formats
- OCI service-specific commands and flags
- Latest OCI features, limits, and regional availability
- CIS Benchmark requirements for OCI
When OCI operations are needed:
1. Use exact CLI commands from skill references
2. Do NOT guess OCI CLI syntax or parameters
3. Do NOT assume API endpoint structures
4. Reference landing-zones skill for Terraform modules
What you DO know:
- General cloud architecture concepts
- Security principles and compliance frameworks
- Multi-tier application design patterns
This skill bridges the gap by providing current OCI-specific patterns and anti-patterns.
You are an OCI architecture expert. This skill provides knowledge Claude lacks: OCI-specific anti-patterns, free tier specifics, terminology gotchas, multi-AD patterns, and differences from AWS/Azure/GCP.
NEVER Do This
❌ NEVER use /24 or smaller VCN CIDR (cannot expand)
# WRONG - VCN too small, cannot expand later (OCI limitation)
oci network vcn create --cidr-block "10.0.0.0/24"
# Only 256 IPs total, exhausted quickly
# WRONG - copying AWS habit (/16 VPC default)
# OCI supports larger: /16 to /30
# RIGHT - start with /16, plan for growth
oci network vcn create --cidr-block "10.0.0.0/16"
# 65,536 IPs, room for 256 /24 subnets
# CRITICAL: OCI VCNs CANNOT be resized after creation
# Must create new VCN and migrate if too small
Migration cost: Recreating VCN = hours of downtime, IP changes, security rule updates
❌ NEVER use AD-specific subnets (breaks multi-AD HA)
# WRONG - subnet tied to single AD
oci network subnet create \
--vcn-id <vcn-ocid> \
--cidr-block "10.0.1.0/24" \
--availability-domain "fMgC:US-ASHBURN-AD-1" # AD-specific!
# Problem: Can't launch instances in other ADs, no HA
# RIGHT - regional subnet (works in all ADs)
oci network subnet create \
--vcn-id <vcn-ocid> \
--cidr-block "10.0.1.0/24"
# No --availability-domain flag = regional
# Instances can be in any AD in region
Gotcha: Some old OCI guides show AD-specific subnets (deprecated pattern)
❌ NEVER confuse Security Lists vs NSGs (different use cases)
OCI has TWO network security mechanisms:
Security Lists (stateful, subnet-level):
- Applied to ALL resources in subnet
- Use for: Broad rules (internet egress, DNS)
- Limit: 5 per subnet
- Changes: Affect all instances in subnet
Network Security Groups (NSG, resource-level):
- Applied to specific resources
- Use for: Granular rules (app tier → DB tier)
- Limit: 5 per resource, 120 rules per NSG
- Changes: Affect only tagged resources
# WRONG - using Security Lists for app-specific rules
Security List: Allow app-tier → database (applies to ENTIRE subnet)
# RIGHT - use NSG for app-tier resources
NSG "app-tier": Allow egress to NSG "db-tier" on port 1521
# Only instances in app-tier NSG can reach DB
Best practice: Security Lists for baseline (internet, DNS), NSGs for application-specific rules
❌ NEVER assume single-AD deployment is acceptable (no SLA)
OCI Availability Domains (ADs):
- 3 ADs per region (most regions)
- Isolated fault domains
- <1ms latency between ADs
# WRONG - all resources in single AD
All instances in AD-1 → AD failure = complete outage
# RIGHT - distribute across ADs
Production instances: AD-1, AD-2, AD-3
Load balancer: Automatically multi-AD
Database: Autonomous (auto 3-AD) or RAC (2+ nodes)
SLA impact:
Single-AD: NO SLA (OCI doesn't guarantee)
Multi-AD: 99.95% SLA
Critical: Oracle refuses SLA claims for single-AD deployments in regions with 3 ADs
❌ NEVER hardcode AD names (tenant-specific)
# WRONG - AD names are tenant-specific, not portable
availability_domain = "fMgC:US-ASHBURN-AD-1" # Only works in YOUR tenancy!
# Another tenant's AD name for same physical AD:
availability_domain = "xYzA:US-ASHBURN-AD-1" # Different prefix!
# RIGHT - query AD names dynamically
data "oci_identity_availability_domains" "ads" {
compartment_id = var.tenancy_ocid
}
resource "oci_core_instance" "web" {
availability_domain = data.oci_identity_availability_domains.ads.availability_domains[0].name
}
Why: OCI generates unique AD prefixes per tenant for security isolation
❌ NEVER enable Cloud Guard auto-remediation without testing
Cloud Guard = OCI threat detection + auto-response
# DANGER - auto-remediation can break production
Detector: "Public bucket detected"
Auto-remediation: Make bucket private → breaks public website!
Detector: "Security list allows 0.0.0.0/0"
Auto-remediation: Remove rule → breaks internet access!
# SAFER approach:
1. Enable detectors (read-only mode first)
2. Review findings for 1-2 weeks
3. Tune responders to avoid false positives
4. Enable auto-remediation for trusted patterns only
Gotcha: Cloud Guard enabled by default in some tenancies, can auto-break things
❌ NEVER assume you need Oracle Linux (common misconception)
OCI supports:
✓ Oracle Linux (free, optimized)
✓ Ubuntu, CentOS, Rocky Linux (free)
✓ Windows Server (BYOL or license-included)
✓ Custom images (import your own)
# WRONG assumption: "OCI = must use Oracle Linux"
Reality: Any Linux works, Ubuntu has larger community
# Cost: Oracle Linux is FREE (no license cost)
# But if team knows Ubuntu → use Ubuntu
Marketing confusion: Oracle pushes Oracle Linux, but it's not required
OCI Always-Free Tier (Exact Limits)
Generous permanent free tier (no credit card trial, no expiration):
Compute
- 2 AMD VMs: VM.Standard.E2.1.Micro (1/8 OCPU, 1 GB RAM each)
- 4 Arm OCPUs: VM.Standard.A1.Flex (allocate as 1×4 OCPU or 4×1 OCPU)
- Up to 24 GB total RAM (6 GB per OCPU)
- Example: Run 4× 1OCPU/6GB Arm instances free forever
Database
- 2 Autonomous Databases: 1 OCPU each, 20 GB storage per ADB
- Can be ATP or ADW
- Limit: 2 total per tenancy across all regions
Storage
- Block volumes: 200 GB total (2× 100 GB boot volumes + custom)
- Object storage: 10 GB Standard tier
- Archive storage: 10 GB Archive tier
- Block volume backups: 10 GB
Networking
- Load balancer: 1 flexible LB, 10 Mbps bandwidth
- VCN: 2 VCNs per region (free, no OCID cost)
- Public IPv4: 1 reserved public IP free per region
Observability
- Monitoring: 1 billion data points ingested
- Logging: 10 GB ingested per month
- Notifications: 1 million emails per month
Always-Free Gotchas
CRITICAL limits often missed:
# Gotcha 1: 2 ADB limit is TENANCY-wide, not per region
Can have: 1 ATP in Phoenix + 1 ADW in Ashburn = 2 (limit reached)
Cannot: Add 3rd ADB in any region
# Gotcha 2: Arm instances must be VM.Standard.A1.Flex only
Cannot: Use newer A2 shapes (paid only)
# Gotcha 3: Free tier != trial credits
Free tier: Permanent, no expiration
Trial: $300 credit for 30 days (separate)
# Gotcha 4: Stopped ADB counts toward 2 ADB limit
To free slot: Must DELETE ADB, not just STOP
OCI Terminology vs AWS/Azure
Migrating from AWS/Azure? Terminology traps:
| OCI Term | AWS Equivalent | Azure Equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| VCN | VPC | Virtual Network |
| Subnet | Subnet | Subnet |
| Security List | VPC Security Group | NSG (network-level) |
| NSG | Security Group | Application Security Group |
| DRG | Virtual Private Gateway | VPN Gateway |
| Compartment | Resource Group / OU | Resource Group |
| Tenancy | Account | Subscription |
| Region | Region | Region |
| AD (Availability Domain) | Availability Zone | Availability Zone |
| Fault Domain | (within AZ) | Availability Set |
| Dynamic Group | IAM Role (for instances) | Managed Identity |
| Instance Principal | EC2 Instance Profile | Managed Identity |
| OCIR | ECR | Container Registry |
| OKE | EKS | AKS |
Critical difference: OCI has both Security Lists (subnet) and NSGs (resource). AWS only has Security Groups (resource-level).
Multi-AD Architecture Patterns
OCI multi-AD specifics:
AD Distribution Strategy
OCI Regions with 3 ADs (most regions):
- US: Phoenix, Ashburn
- UK: London
- DE: Frankfurt
- AU: Sydney, Melbourne
Pattern: Distribute instances across all 3 ADs
AD-1: Web tier (2 instances) + DB primary
AD-2: Web tier (2 instances) + DB standby
AD-3: Web tier (2 instances) + DB standby
Load Balancer: Automatically spans ADs
Gotcha: Some shapes only available in specific ADs (check first)
# Check shape availability by AD
oci compute shape list \
--compartment-id <ocid> \
--availability-domain "fMgC:US-ASHBURN-AD-1"
Fault Domain Additional Layer
Within each AD, OCI has Fault Domains (FD):
- 3 FDs per AD
- Separate power, cooling, network
- <1ms latency within AD
Best practice: Spread instances across ADs AND FDs
AD-1:
FD-1: Web instance 1
FD-2: Web instance 2
FD-3: Web instance 3
AD-2:
FD-1: Web instance 4
(repeat pattern)
Protection:
- AD failure: 2 ADs survive (66% capacity)
- FD failure: Only 1 instance affected (16% capacity)
When to use FDs: Only for extra-critical apps (adds complexity)
Compartment Strategy Best Practices
Compartment hierarchy (OCI-specific IAM boundary):
Root Compartment (tenancy)
│
├─ SharedServices (networking, security)
│ ├─ Network (VCNs, DRGs)
│ └─ Security (Vault, KMS, Cloud Guard)
│
├─ Production
│ ├─ App1
│ │ ├─ Compute
│ │ ├─ Database
│ │ └─ Storage
│ └─ App2
│
├─ NonProduction
│ ├─ Development
│ ├─ Testing
│ └─ Staging
│
└─ Sandbox (developers, auto-cleanup)
Key principles:
1. Billing separation: Compartment tags enable cost reporting by environment
2. IAM boundaries: Policies scoped to compartments (least privilege)
3. Quota isolation: Separate limits per compartment
4. Lifecycle: Delete entire compartment = deletes all resources inside
Anti-pattern: Flat structure with no hierarchy (AWS account-per-env habit)
Cost Optimization OCI-Specific
Flex Shape Savings (Unique to OCI)
Fixed shapes (legacy):
VM.Standard2.4: 4 OCPUs, 60 GB RAM, $218/month
Flex shapes (right-size RAM independently):
VM.Standard.E4.Flex: 4 OCPUs, 16 GB RAM, $109/month (50% savings)
Flex advantage: Pay only for RAM you need
- 1 OCPU = 1-64 GB RAM configurable
- Most apps don't need 15GB per OCPU (fixed ratio)
Migration: Replace fixed shapes with Flex for 30-50% savings
Arm Instance Savings (Generous Free Tier)
AMD instance: VM.Standard.E4.Flex (1 OCPU) = $0.03/hr
Arm instance: VM.Standard.A1.Flex (1 OCPU) = $0.01/hr (67% cheaper)
Always-Free Arm: 4 OCPUs free forever!
Use case: Web servers, CI/CD runners, dev environments
Limitation: ARM64 only (not all apps compatible)
Gotcha: Free tier is A1 shapes only, newer A2 shapes are paid
Storage Tiering (Exact Prices)
| Tier | Cost/GB/Month | Use Case | Retrieval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $0.0255 | Active data, frequent access | Instant, free |
| Infrequent Access | $0.0125 (51% off) | Backups, logs (accessed monthly) | Instant, $0.01/GB |
| Archive | $0.0024 (91% off) | Compliance, long-term retention | 1 hour, $0.01/GB |
Lifecycle policy example:
Day 0-30: Standard ($0.0255/GB/mo)
Day 31-90: Infrequent ($0.0125/GB/mo)
Day 91+: Archive ($0.0024/GB/mo)
1 TB data for 1 year:
Without tiering: $0.0255 × 1000 × 12 = $306/year
With tiering: $0.0255 × 1000 × 1 + $0.0125 × 1000 × 2 + $0.0024 × 1000 × 9 = $72/year
Savings: $234/year (76%)
Security Zones (OCI-Unique)
OCI Security Zones = Infrastructure-level policy enforcement:
Security Zone enforces:
✓ All storage encrypted
✓ No public buckets
✓ No internet gateways in VCN
✓ All databases private endpoint only
✓ Cloud Guard enabled
Enforcement: API rejects violating requests (preventive, not detective)
Example:
oci os bucket create --public-access-type ObjectRead
→ FAILS if compartment is in Security Zone
Use case: Production, PCI-DSS, healthcare (mandatory controls)
Gotcha: Security Zones can break existing automation (test in dev first)
Progressive Loading References
OCI Well-Architected Checklist
WHEN TO LOAD oci-well-architected-checklist.md:
- Running compliance checks against OCI tenancy
- Preparing for CIS OCI Foundations Benchmark audit
- Implementing automated security scanning
- Creating remediation scripts for common findings
- Setting up monitoring for drift detection
Do NOT load for:
- Quick anti-pattern reference (NEVER list above covers it)
- Architecture decisions (covered in this skill)
- Understanding OCI terminology (tables above)
When to Use This Skill
- Architecture design: Multi-AD patterns, compartment strategy, VCN sizing
- Migration from AWS/Azure: Terminology mapping, anti-pattern avoidance
- Cost optimization: Free tier planning, Flex shapes, storage tiering
- Security: Cloud Guard tuning, Security Zones, NSG vs Security Lists
- Production readiness: SLA requirements, HA patterns, fault tolerance
# Supported AI Coding Agents
This skill is compatible with the SKILL.md standard and works with all major AI coding agents:
Learn more about the SKILL.md standard and how to use these skills with your preferred AI coding agent.