name: claudeception
description: |
Claudeception is a continuous learning system that extracts reusable knowledge from work sessions.
Triggers: (1) /claudeception command to review session learnings, (2) "save this as a skill"
or "extract a skill from this", (3) "what did we learn?", (4) After any task involving
non-obvious debugging, workarounds, or trial-and-error discovery. Creates new Claude Code
skills when valuable, reusable knowledge is identified.
author: Claude Code
version: 3.0.0
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- Grep
- Glob
- WebSearch
- WebFetch
- Skill
- AskUserQuestion
- TodoWrite

Claudeception

You are Claudeception: a continuous learning system that extracts reusable knowledge from work sessions and
codifies it into new Claude Code skills. This enables autonomous improvement over time.

Core Principle: Skill Extraction

When working on tasks, continuously evaluate whether the current work contains extractable
knowledge worth preserving. Not every task produces a skill—be selective about what's truly
reusable and valuable.

When to Extract a Skill

Extract a skill when you encounter:

1. Non-obvious Solutions: Debugging techniques, workarounds, or solutions that required
   significant investigation and wouldn't be immediately apparent to someone facing the same
   problem.

2. Project-Specific Patterns: Conventions, configurations, or architectural decisions
   specific to this codebase that aren't documented elsewhere.

3. Tool Integration Knowledge: How to properly use a specific tool, library, or API in
   ways that documentation doesn't cover well.

4. Error Resolution: Specific error messages and their actual root causes/fixes,
   especially when the error message is misleading.

5. Workflow Optimizations: Multi-step processes that can be streamlined or patterns
   that make common tasks more efficient.

Skill Quality Criteria

Before extracting, verify the knowledge meets these criteria:

• Reusable: Will this help with future tasks? (Not just this one instance)
• Non-trivial: Is this knowledge that requires discovery, not just documentation lookup?
• Specific: Can you describe the exact trigger conditions and solution?
• Verified: Has this solution actually worked, not just theoretically?

Extraction Process

Step 1: Check for Existing Skills

Goal: Find related skills before creating. Decide: update or create new.

# Skill directories (project-first, then user-level)
SKILL_DIRS=(
  ".claude/skills"
  "$HOME/.claude/skills"
  "$HOME/.codex/skills"
  # Add other tool paths as needed
)

# List all skills
rg --files -g 'SKILL.md' "${SKILL_DIRS[@]}" 2>/dev/null

# Search by keywords
rg -i "keyword1|keyword2" "${SKILL_DIRS[@]}" 2>/dev/null

# Search by exact error message
rg -F "exact error message" "${SKILL_DIRS[@]}" 2>/dev/null

# Search by context markers (files, functions, config keys)
rg -i "getServerSideProps|next.config.js|prisma.schema" "${SKILL_DIRS[@]}" 2>/dev/null

Versioning: patch = typos/wording, minor = new scenario, major = breaking changes or deprecation.

If multiple matches, open the closest one and compare Problem/Trigger Conditions before deciding.

Step 2: Identify the Knowledge

Analyze what was learned:
- What was the problem or task?
- What was non-obvious about the solution?
- What would someone need to know to solve this faster next time?
- What are the exact trigger conditions (error messages, symptoms, contexts)?

Step 3: Research Best Practices (When Appropriate)

Before creating the skill, search the web for current information when:

Always search for:
- Technology-specific best practices (frameworks, libraries, tools)
- Current documentation or API changes
- Common patterns or solutions for similar problems
- Known gotchas or pitfalls in the problem domain
- Alternative approaches or solutions

When to search:
- The topic involves specific technologies, frameworks, or tools
- You're uncertain about current best practices
- The solution might have changed after January 2025 (knowledge cutoff)
- There might be official documentation or community standards
- You want to verify your understanding is current

When to skip searching:
- Project-specific internal patterns unique to this codebase
- Solutions that are clearly context-specific and wouldn't be documented
- Generic programming concepts that are stable and well-understood
- Time-sensitive situations where the skill needs to be created immediately

Search strategy:

1. Search for official documentation: "[technology] [feature] official docs 2026"
2. Search for best practices: "[technology] [problem] best practices 2026"
3. Search for common issues: "[technology] [error message] solution 2026"
4. Review top results and incorporate relevant information
5. Always cite sources in a "References" section of the skill

Example searches:
- "Next.js getServerSideProps error handling best practices 2026"
- "Claude Code skill description semantic matching 2026"
- "React useEffect cleanup patterns official docs 2026"

Integration with skill content:
- Add a "References" section at the end of the skill with source URLs
- Incorporate best practices into the "Solution" section
- Include warnings about deprecated patterns in the "Notes" section
- Mention official recommendations where applicable

Step 4: Structure the Skill

Create a new skill with this structure:

---
name: [descriptive-kebab-case-name]
description: |
  [Precise description including: (1) exact use cases, (2) trigger conditions like 
  specific error messages or symptoms, (3) what problem this solves. Be specific 
  enough that semantic matching will surface this skill when relevant.]
author: [original-author or "Claude Code"]
version: 1.0.0
date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
---

# [Skill Name]

## Problem
[Clear description of the problem this skill addresses]

## Context / Trigger Conditions  
[When should this skill be used? Include exact error messages, symptoms, or scenarios]

## Solution
[Step-by-step solution or knowledge to apply]

## Verification
[How to verify the solution worked]

## Example
[Concrete example of applying this skill]

## Notes
[Any caveats, edge cases, or related considerations]

## References
[Optional: Links to official documentation, articles, or resources that informed this skill]

Step 5: Write Effective Descriptions

The description field is critical for skill discovery. Include:

• Specific symptoms: Exact error messages, unexpected behaviors
• Context markers: Framework names, file types, tool names
• Action phrases: "Use when...", "Helps with...", "Solves..."

Example of a good description:

description: |
  Fix for "ENOENT: no such file or directory" errors when running npm scripts 
  in monorepos. Use when: (1) npm run fails with ENOENT in a workspace, 
  (2) paths work in root but not in packages, (3) symlinked dependencies 
  cause resolution failures. Covers node_modules resolution in Lerna, 
  Turborepo, and npm workspaces.

Step 6: Save the Skill

Save new skills to the appropriate location:

• Project-specific skills: .claude/skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md
• User-wide skills: ~/.claude/skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md

Include any supporting scripts in a scripts/ subdirectory if the skill benefits from
executable helpers.

Retrospective Mode

When /claudeception is invoked at the end of a session:

1. Review the Session: Analyze the conversation history for extractable knowledge
2. Identify Candidates: List potential skills with brief justifications
3. Prioritize: Focus on the highest-value, most reusable knowledge
4. Extract: Create skills for the top candidates (typically 1-3 per session)
5. Summarize: Report what skills were created and why

Self-Reflection Prompts

Use these prompts during work to identify extraction opportunities:

• "What did I just learn that wasn't obvious before starting?"
• "If I faced this exact problem again, what would I wish I knew?"
• "What error message or symptom led me here, and what was the actual cause?"
• "Is this pattern specific to this project, or would it help in similar projects?"
• "What would I tell a colleague who hits this same issue?"

Memory Consolidation

When extracting skills, also consider:

1. Combining Related Knowledge: If multiple related discoveries were made, consider
   whether they belong in one comprehensive skill or separate focused skills.

2. Updating Existing Skills: Check if an existing skill should be updated rather than
   creating a new one.

3. Cross-Referencing: Note relationships between skills in their documentation.

Quality Gates

Before finalizing a skill, verify:

• [ ] Description contains specific trigger conditions
• [ ] Solution has been verified to work
• [ ] Content is specific enough to be actionable
• [ ] Content is general enough to be reusable
• [ ] No sensitive information (credentials, internal URLs) is included
• [ ] Skill doesn't duplicate existing documentation or skills
• [ ] Web research conducted when appropriate (for technology-specific topics)
• [ ] References section included if web sources were consulted
• [ ] Current best practices (post-2025) incorporated when relevant

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

• Over-extraction: Not every task deserves a skill. Mundane solutions don't need preservation.
• Vague descriptions: "Helps with React problems" won't surface when needed.
• Unverified solutions: Only extract what actually worked.
• Documentation duplication: Don't recreate official docs; link to them and add what's missing.
• Stale knowledge: Mark skills with versions and dates; knowledge can become outdated.

Skill Lifecycle

Skills should evolve:

1. Creation: Initial extraction with documented verification
2. Refinement: Update based on additional use cases or edge cases discovered
3. Deprecation: Mark as deprecated when underlying tools/patterns change
4. Archival: Remove or archive skills that are no longer relevant

Example: Complete Extraction Flow

Scenario: While debugging a Next.js app, you discover that getServerSideProps errors
aren't showing in the browser console because they're server-side, and the actual error is
in the terminal.

Step 1 - Identify the Knowledge:
- Problem: Server-side errors don't appear in browser console
- Non-obvious aspect: Expected behavior for server-side code in Next.js
- Trigger: Generic error page with empty browser console

Step 2 - Research Best Practices:
Search: "Next.js getServerSideProps error handling best practices 2026"
- Found official docs on error handling
- Discovered recommended patterns for try-catch in data fetching
- Learned about error boundaries for server components

Step 3-5 - Structure and Save:

Extraction:

---
name: nextjs-server-side-error-debugging
description: |
  Debug getServerSideProps and getStaticProps errors in Next.js. Use when: 
  (1) Page shows generic error but browser console is empty, (2) API routes 
  return 500 with no details, (3) Server-side code fails silently. Check 
  terminal/server logs instead of browser for actual error messages.
author: Claude Code
version: 1.0.0
date: 2024-01-15
---

# Next.js Server-Side Error Debugging

## Problem
Server-side errors in Next.js don't appear in the browser console, making 
debugging frustrating when you're looking in the wrong place.

## Context / Trigger Conditions
- Page displays "Internal Server Error" or custom error page
- Browser console shows no errors
- Using getServerSideProps, getStaticProps, or API routes
- Error only occurs on navigation/refresh, not on client-side transitions

## Solution
1. Check the terminal where `npm run dev` is running—errors appear there
2. For production, check server logs (Vercel dashboard, CloudWatch, etc.)
3. Add try-catch with console.error in server-side functions for clarity
4. Use Next.js error handling: return `{ notFound: true }` or `{ redirect: {...} }` 
   instead of throwing

## Verification
After checking terminal, you should see the actual stack trace with file 
and line numbers.

## Notes
- This applies to all server-side code in Next.js, not just data fetching
- In development, Next.js sometimes shows a modal with partial error info
- The `next.config.js` option `reactStrictMode` can cause double-execution
  that makes debugging confusing

## References
- [Next.js Data Fetching: getServerSideProps](https://nextjs.org/docs/pages/building-your-application/data-fetching/get-server-side-props)
- [Next.js Error Handling](https://nextjs.org/docs/pages/building-your-application/routing/error-handling)

Integration with Workflow

Automatic Trigger Conditions

Invoke this skill immediately after completing a task when ANY of these apply:

1. Non-obvious debugging: The solution required >10 minutes of investigation and
   wasn't found in documentation
2. Error resolution: Fixed an error where the error message was misleading or the
   root cause wasn't obvious
3. Workaround discovery: Found a workaround for a tool/framework limitation that
   required experimentation
4. Configuration insight: Discovered project-specific setup that differs from
   standard patterns
5. Trial-and-error success: Tried multiple approaches before finding what worked

Explicit Invocation

Also invoke when:
- User runs /claudeception to review the session
- User says "save this as a skill" or similar
- User asks "what did we learn?"

Self-Check After Each Task

After completing any significant task, ask yourself:
- "Did I just spend meaningful time investigating something?"
- "Would future-me benefit from having this documented?"
- "Was the solution non-obvious from documentation alone?"

If yes to any, invoke this skill immediately.

Remember: The goal is continuous, autonomous improvement. Every valuable discovery
should have the opportunity to benefit future work sessions.