ValorVie

ai-collaboration-standards

0
0
# Install this skill:
npx skills add ValorVie/custom-skills --skill "ai-collaboration-standards"

Install specific skill from multi-skill repository

# Description

|

# SKILL.md


name: ai-collaboration-standards
scope: universal
description: |
Prevent AI hallucination and ensure evidence-based responses when analyzing code or making suggestions.
Use when: analyzing code, making recommendations, providing options, or when user asks about confidence/certainty.
Keywords: certainty, assumption, inference, evidence, source, 確定性, 推測, 假設, 來源, 證據.


AI Collaboration Standards

Language: English | 繁體中文

Version: 1.1.1
Last Updated: 2026-01-30
Applicability: Claude Code Skills


Purpose

This skill ensures AI assistants provide accurate, evidence-based responses without hallucination.

Quick Reference

Unified Tag System

This skill uses two complementary tag categories:

Category 1: Certainty Tags (for analyzing existing content)

Tag Use When
[Confirmed] Direct evidence from code/docs
[Inferred] Logical deduction from evidence
[Assumption] Based on common patterns (needs verification)
[Unknown] Information not available
[Need Confirmation] Requires user clarification

Category 2: Derivation Tags (for generating new content)

Tag Use When
[Source] Direct content from spec/requirement
[Derived] Transformed from source content
[Generated] AI-generated structure
[TODO] Requires human implementation

When to Use Which:

Workflow Primary Tags
Code analysis Certainty Tags
Reverse engineering Certainty Tags
Forward derivation Derivation Tags
Spec generation Derivation Tags

Source Types

Source Type Tag Reliability
Project Code [Source: Code] ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Highest
Project Docs [Source: Docs] ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High
External Docs [Source: External] ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High
Web Search [Source: Search] ⭐⭐⭐ Medium
AI Knowledge [Source: Knowledge] ⭐⭐ Low
User Provided [Source: User] ⭐⭐⭐ Medium

Core Rules

  1. Evidence-Based Only: Only analyze content that has been explicitly read
  2. Cite Sources: Include file path and line number for code references
  3. Classify Certainty: Tag all statements with certainty level
  4. Always Recommend: When presenting options, include a recommended choice with reasoning

Detailed Guidelines

For complete standards, see:
- Anti-Hallucination Guidelines
- Certainty Labels Reference

Examples

✅ Correct Response

[Confirmed] src/auth/service.ts:45 - JWT validation uses 'jsonwebtoken' library
[Inferred] Based on repository pattern in src/repositories/, likely using dependency injection
[Need Confirmation] Should the new feature support multi-tenancy?

❌ Incorrect Response

The system uses Redis for caching (code not reviewed)
The UserService should have an authenticate() method (API not verified)

✅ Correct Option Presentation

There are three options:
1. Redis caching
2. In-memory caching
3. File-based caching

**Recommended: Option 1 (Redis)**: Given the project already has Redis infrastructure
and needs cross-instance cache sharing, Redis is the most suitable choice.

❌ Incorrect Option Presentation

There are three options:
1. Redis caching
2. In-memory caching
3. File-based caching

Please choose one.

Checklist

Before making any statement:

  • [ ] Source Verified - Have I read the actual file/document?
  • [ ] Source Type Tagged - Did I specify [Source: Code], [Source: External], etc.?
  • [ ] Reference Cited - Did I include file path and line number?
  • [ ] Certainty Classified - Did I tag as [Confirmed], [Inferred], etc.?
  • [ ] No Fabrication - Did I avoid inventing APIs, configs, or requirements?
  • [ ] Recommendation Included - When presenting options, did I include a recommended choice?

Configuration Detection

This skill supports project-specific language configuration for certainty tags.

Detection Order

  1. Check CONTRIBUTING.md for "Certainty Tag Language" section
  2. If found, use the specified language (English / 中文)
  3. If not found, default to English tags

First-Time Setup

If no configuration found and context is unclear:

  1. Ask the user: "This project hasn't configured certainty tag language preference. Which would you like to use? (English / 中文)"
  2. After user selection, suggest documenting in CONTRIBUTING.md:
## Certainty Tag Language

This project uses **[English / 中文]** certainty tags.
<!-- Options: English | 中文 -->

Configuration Example

In project's CONTRIBUTING.md:

## Certainty Tag Language

This project uses **English** certainty tags.

### Tag Reference
- [Confirmed] - Direct evidence from code/docs
- [Inferred] - Logical deduction from evidence
- [Assumption] - Based on common patterns
- [Unknown] - Information not available
- [Need Confirmation] - Requires user clarification


Version History

Version Date Changes
1.1.0 2026-01-25 Added: Unified Tag System with Certainty and Derivation tag categories
1.0.0 2025-12-24 Added: Standard sections (Purpose, Related Standards, Version History, License)

License

This skill is released under CC BY 4.0.

Source: universal-dev-standards

# Supported AI Coding Agents

This skill is compatible with the SKILL.md standard and works with all major AI coding agents:

Learn more about the SKILL.md standard and how to use these skills with your preferred AI coding agent.