name: debugging-complex-multi-layer-systems
description: A reasoning pattern for diagnosing and fixing bugs that span multiple abstraction layers in complex systems.

Layered Bug Diagnosis Pattern

Use this reasoning pattern when fixing one bug reveals another bug in the same operation, or when debugging complex multi-layer systems.

Pattern Recognition Triggers

Invoke this pattern when:

• Fixing a bug doesn't resolve the user-visible issue
• Test case passes but integration still fails
• Error messages change after initial fix (sign of layered issues)
• Operation involves 3+ abstraction layers (UI → Service → Data → External)
• Symptoms appear in one layer but root cause may be elsewhere

Core Methodology

Phase 1: Map the Layers

Identify all abstraction layers involved in the failing operation:

Example: iMi PR Worktree Creation

Layer 1: CLI Command Handler (main.rs::handle_review_command)
         ↓ calls
Layer 2: Worktree Manager (worktree.rs::create_pr_worktree_with_gh)
         ↓ calls
Layer 3: Git Manager (git.rs::checkout_pr)
         ↓ calls
Layer 4: External Tools (gh CLI, git commands)
         ↓ affects
Layer 5: Filesystem State (directories, .git metadata)

Key Question: Which layer owns each symptom?

• Wrong repository location → Layer 2 (Worktree Manager resolution)
• Branch checkout side effect → Layer 3 (Git Manager implementation)

Phase 2: Symptom Assignment

Map each observable symptom to its originating layer:

Pattern: Architectural issues (wrong entity, wrong location) originate in higher layers. Implementation issues (side effects, race conditions) originate in lower layers.

Phase 3: Fix Order Strategy

Rule: Fix top-down (highest layer first)

Rationale:

• Higher layer bugs often make lower layer bugs untestable
• Architectural fixes clarify constraints for implementation fixes
• Lower layer fixes may become unnecessary once architecture corrects

Example Sequence:

1. Fix Layer 2: Resolve to correct repository before operations
2. Test → reveals Layer 3 bug
3. Fix Layer 3: Fetch PR without checkout side effect
4. Test → operation succeeds

Anti-pattern: Fixing Layer 3 first

• Worktree created in correct repo (Layer 2 fixed)
• But trunk still gets corrupted (Layer 3 unfixed)
• Now debugging corruption in the right repo instead of wrong repo
• Wastes time on compounded issues

Phase 4: Isolation Testing

After each layer fix, test only that layer's contract:

// Layer 2 test: Repository resolution
#[test]
fn test_resolve_repo_from_github_format() {
    let manager = create_test_manager();
    let resolved = manager.resolve_repo_name(Some("YIC-Triumph/trinote2.0")).await?;
    assert_eq!(resolved, "trinote2.0");

    let db_repo = manager.db.get_repository(&resolved).await?.unwrap();
    assert!(db_repo.remote_url.contains("YIC-Triumph/trinote2.0"));
}

// Layer 3 test: PR fetch without checkout
#[test]
fn test_fetch_pr_without_trunk_corruption() {
    let repo = setup_test_repo();
    let trunk_branch = get_current_branch(&repo);

    git_manager.checkout_pr(&repo_path, 458, &worktree_path)?;

    let trunk_branch_after = get_current_branch(&repo);
    assert_eq!(trunk_branch, trunk_branch_after); // Trunk unchanged
    assert!(worktree_path.exists()); // Worktree created
}

Phase 5: Integration Validation

Only after all layer fixes, run end-to-end test:

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_pr_worktree_cross_repo_integration() {
    // Setup: User in repo A
    env::set_current_dir("/home/delorenj/code/iMi/trunk-main")?;

    // Action: Create PR worktree in repo B
    let result = manager.create_review_worktree(458, Some("YIC-Triumph/trinote2.0")).await?;

    // Verify Layer 2: Correct repo
    assert!(result.starts_with("/home/delorenj/code/trinote2.0/pr-458"));

    // Verify Layer 3: No trunk corruption
    let repo_b_trunk = Repository::open("/home/delorenj/code/trinote2.0/trunk-main")?;
    assert_eq!(get_current_branch(&repo_b_trunk), "main");

    let repo_a_trunk = Repository::open("/home/delorenj/code/iMi/trunk-main")?;
    assert_eq!(get_current_branch(&repo_a_trunk), "main");
}

Diagnostic Decision Tree

[Symptom: Operation fails with error X]
    ↓
[Run operation, capture full error trace]
    ↓
[Identify deepest layer in stack trace]
    ↓
[Is error in expected layer for this symptom?]
    ├─ Yes → Single-layer bug, fix directly
    └─ No → Layered bug, start mapping
        ↓
    [Map all layers involved]
        ↓
    [Identify symptoms at each layer]
        ↓
    [Start fixing from highest layer]
        ↓
    [Test layer contract]
        ├─ Pass → Move to next layer
        └─ Fail → Iterate on current layer
            ↓
        [All layers fixed?]
            ├─ No → Continue fixing next layer
            └─ Yes → Integration test

Common Layer Patterns

Data Layer Issues

Symptoms: Wrong entity retrieved, missing relationships, stale cache
Fix Strategy: Query validation, cache invalidation, data integrity checks

Business Logic Layer Issues

Symptoms: Wrong calculation, incorrect state transition, missing validation
Fix Strategy: Unit tests for edge cases, state machine verification

API/Interface Layer Issues

Symptoms: Wrong parameters passed, incorrect serialization, broken contracts
Fix Strategy: Contract tests, schema validation, integration tests

External System Layer Issues

Symptoms: Unexpected side effects, race conditions, resource conflicts
Fix Strategy: Isolation (don't rely on side effects), idempotency, retries

Real-World Example: This iMi Bug

Initial State

• User reports: PR worktree created in wrong repository

Layer Mapping

Layer 1: CLI (main.rs) ✓ Correct - passes repo argument
Layer 2: Manager (worktree.rs) ✗ Bug - uses current_dir() instead of resolving repo
Layer 3: Git (git.rs) ✗ Hidden bug - gh pr checkout has side effect
Layer 4: External (gh CLI) ✓ Correct - works as designed

Fix Sequence

1. Fixed Layer 2 first: Resolve repo from database before operations
2. Test: imi pr 458 YIC-Triumph/trinote2.0 from iMi directory

3. Result: Error changed - now trying to create in trinote2.0 but getting "branch already used"

4. This revealed Layer 3 bug: Side effect in checkout_pr

5. Investigation: gh pr checkout was switching trunk to PR branch

6. Root cause: Checkout happens in trunk directory before worktree creation

7. Fixed Layer 3: Replace checkout with fetch

8. Changed from: gh pr checkout (side effect)
9. Changed to: gh pr view + git fetch (no side effect)
10. Test: Trunk remains on main, worktree created successfully

Lessons

• Fixing Layer 2 first was correct - architectural before implementation
• Layer 3 bug was untestable until Layer 2 worked correctly
• Both bugs were necessary to fix, but order mattered for efficiency

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

1. Bottom-Up Fixing

Mistake: Start with lowest layer because "it's simpler"
Problem: Higher layer bug may make lower layer fix irrelevant

2. Shotgun Debugging

Mistake: Change multiple layers simultaneously
Problem: Can't isolate which fix resolved which symptom

3. Symptom Whack-a-Mole

Mistake: Fix each new error as it appears without mapping layers
Problem: Never address root architectural issues

4. Premature Integration Testing

Mistake: Only run end-to-end tests, no layer isolation
Problem: Can't determine which layer failed when integration breaks

Documentation Template

When encountering layered bugs, document:

## Bug Report: [Operation] fails with [Symptom]

### Layer Mapping

- Layer N: [Component] - Status: [✓/✗] - Issue: [description]
- Layer N-1: [Component] - Status: [✓/✗] - Issue: [description]
  ...

### Fix Order

1. Fixed [Layer X]: [What changed]
   - Test result: [Pass/Fail/Revealed Layer Y bug]
2. Fixed [Layer Y]: [What changed]
   - Test result: [Pass/Fail]

### Root Causes

- [Layer X]: [Architectural/Implementation] - [Reason]
- [Layer Y]: [Architectural/Implementation] - [Reason]

### Tests Added

- [Layer X contract test]: `test_name_x()`
- [Layer Y contract test]: `test_name_y()`
- [Integration test]: `test_name_integration()`

Related Skills

• git-state-recovery: For Layer 5 (filesystem state) issues
• ecosystem-patterns: For architectural layer decisions
• debugging: For investigation techniques at each layer