TalonT-Org

make-arch-diag

1
0
# Install this skill:
npx skills add TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit --skill "make-arch-diag"

Install specific skill from multi-skill repository

# Description

Generate architecture diagram for a specific component or system. Prompts user to select which area to document, then creates comprehensive mermaid diagrams.

# SKILL.md


name: make-arch-diag
description: Generate architecture diagram for a specific component or system. Prompts user to select which area to document, then creates comprehensive mermaid diagrams.


Make-Arch-Diag: Architecture Diagram Generation

Creates comprehensive architecture diagrams for selected components or systems using mermaid syntax.

When to Use

  • Documenting a new feature or component
  • Updating architecture documentation after changes
  • Onboarding new team members
  • Explaining complex system interactions
  • Before making significant architectural changes

Critical Constraints

ALWAYS:
- Ask user which component/system to diagram
- Use the /mermaid skill for diagram creation
- Include multiple views (data flow, component structure, sequence diagrams)
- Save diagrams to temp/make-arch-diag/{component-name}/
- Use consistent color coding across all diagrams

NEVER:
- Create diagrams without understanding the code
- Skip reading the actual implementation
- Use generic placeholder names
- Create diagrams that contradict the code


Workflow

Step 1: Component Selection

Ask the user which area they want diagrammed:

Which component or system would you like to diagram?

Examples:
- Authentication system
- Database layer
- API endpoints
- Message queue processing
- State management
- Specific feature (e.g., "user registration flow")

Please specify the component/system:

Step 2: Scope Definition

Based on user input, determine:
- Boundaries: What's in scope vs out of scope
- Level of Detail: High-level architecture vs detailed implementation
- Audience: Developers, architects, stakeholders

Step 3: Code Exploration

Investigate the codebase:
- Find entry points (main, CLI, API routes)
- Trace execution flows
- Identify components and their relationships
- Map data flows
- Document external dependencies

Step 4: Diagram Types Selection

Choose appropriate diagram types:

Component Diagram (Always include)
- Shows major components and their relationships
- Good for: Understanding system structure

Data Flow Diagram (Include if data transformation is central)
- Shows how data moves through the system
- Good for: Understanding pipelines, ETL, processing

Sequence Diagram (Include if interactions are complex)
- Shows step-by-step execution flow
- Good for: Understanding request/response, async operations

State Diagram (Include if state management is central)
- Shows states and transitions
- Good for: Understanding lifecycle, workflows

Deployment Diagram (Include for infrastructure docs)
- Shows how system is deployed
- Good for: Understanding runtime environment

Step 5: Create Diagrams

Use /mermaid skill to create each diagram:
- Follow standard color palette
- Include legends
- Add clear labels and descriptions
- Group related components in subgraphs

Step 6: Write Architecture Description

Create temp/make-arch-diag/{component}/architecture.md:

# {Component} Architecture

## Overview
[2-3 paragraph overview of the component]

## Diagrams

### Component Structure
[Embed component diagram]

### Data Flow
[Embed data flow diagram]

### Sequence Diagrams
[Embed sequence diagrams for key operations]

## Components

### Component 1: {Name}
- **Purpose**: [What it does]
- **Responsibilities**: [What it's responsible for]
- **Dependencies**: [What it depends on]
- **Interface**: [How others interact with it]

### Component 2: {Name}
[Repeat for each component]

## Key Flows

### Flow 1: {Operation}
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Step 3]

### Flow 2: {Operation}
[Repeat for each key operation]

## Design Decisions

### Decision 1: {Topic}
- **Context**: [Why this decision was needed]
- **Options Considered**: [Alternatives]
- **Chosen**: [What was chosen]
- **Rationale**: [Why]
- **Tradeoffs**: [Costs and benefits]

## Constraints and Invariants

- [Constraint 1]
- [Constraint 2]
- [Invariant 1]
- [Invariant 2]

## Extension Points

- [Where/how to extend functionality]

## Related Documentation

- [Links to other architecture docs]
- [Links to API documentation]
- [Links to design documents]

Example: Authentication System

Component Diagram

%%{init: {'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 50, 'rankSpacing': 60}}}%%
graph TB
    classDef handler fill:#e65100,stroke:#ffb74d,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef stateNode fill:#004d40,stroke:#4db6ac,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef integration fill:#c62828,stroke:#ef9a9a,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef output fill:#00695c,stroke:#4db6ac,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;

    subgraph API ["API Layer"]
        Login["/login endpoint<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>POST credentials"]
        Refresh["/refresh endpoint<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>POST refresh token"]
        Logout["/logout endpoint<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>POST token"]
    end

    subgraph Auth ["Authentication Service"]
        AuthService["AuthService<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>authenticate()<br/>generate_token()<br/>verify_token()"]
        TokenManager["TokenManager<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>create_access_token()<br/>create_refresh_token()<br/>validate_token()"]
    end

    subgraph Storage ["Data Layer"]
        UserDB[(User Database)]
        TokenCache[(Token Cache<br/>Redis)]
    end

    Login --> AuthService
    Refresh --> TokenManager
    Logout --> TokenManager

    AuthService --> UserDB
    AuthService --> TokenManager
    TokenManager --> TokenCache

    class Login,Refresh,Logout handler;
    class UserDB,TokenCache stateNode;
    class AuthService,TokenManager integration;

Color Legend:
| Color | Category | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Orange | Handler | API endpoints |
| Teal | State | Data storage |
| Red | Integration | Service components |

Sequence Diagram: Login Flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API as /login endpoint
    participant Auth as AuthService
    participant DB as User Database
    participant TM as TokenManager
    participant Cache as Redis

    Client->>API: POST /login {username, password}
    API->>Auth: authenticate(username, password)
    Auth->>DB: query user by username
    DB-->>Auth: User record
    Auth->>Auth: verify password hash

    alt Valid credentials
        Auth->>TM: generate_tokens(user_id)
        TM->>Cache: store refresh token
        Cache-->>TM: OK
        TM-->>Auth: {access_token, refresh_token}
        Auth-->>API: Success + tokens
        API-->>Client: 200 OK + tokens
    else Invalid credentials
        Auth-->>API: AuthenticationError
        API-->>Client: 401 Unauthorized
    end

Data Flow Diagram

%%{init: {'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 40, 'rankSpacing': 50}}}%%
flowchart LR
    classDef phase fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#ba68c8,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef handler fill:#e65100,stroke:#ffb74d,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef output fill:#00695c,stroke:#4db6ac,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;

    Input["Credentials<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>username<br/>password"]

    subgraph Processing
        Hash["Hash Password<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>bcrypt"]
        Compare["Compare<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>stored vs provided"]
        Generate["Generate Tokens<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>JWT + Refresh"]
    end

    Output["Response<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>access_token<br/>refresh_token<br/>expires_in"]

    Input --> Hash --> Compare --> Generate --> Output

    class Input phase;
    class Hash,Compare,Generate handler;
    class Output output;

Color Legend:
| Color | Category | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Purple | Phase | Input/stages |
| Orange | Handler | Processing steps |
| Dark Teal | Output | Final output |


Diagram Best Practices

1. Component Diagrams

  • Group related components in subgraphs
  • Show only direct dependencies (avoid clutter)
  • Use consistent colors for component types
  • Label interfaces/contracts

2. Data Flow Diagrams

  • Flow left-to-right or top-to-bottom
  • Show transformations clearly
  • Indicate data format at each stage
  • Highlight validation points

3. Sequence Diagrams

  • Include all actors/systems
  • Show both success and error paths
  • Annotate with actual function/method names
  • Include timing constraints if relevant

4. State Diagrams

  • Show all valid states
  • Show all valid transitions
  • Annotate transitions with trigger conditions
  • Highlight error/terminal states

Common Patterns to Diagram

Layered Architecture

Presentation Layer → Business Logic Layer → Data Access Layer

Use component diagram with horizontal layers.

Pipeline Architecture

Input → Stage 1 → Stage 2 → Stage 3 → Output

Use data flow diagram showing transformations.

Event-Driven Architecture

Event Source → Event Bus → Handlers → Side Effects

Use sequence diagram showing event flow.

Microservices Architecture

Service A ↔ API Gateway ↔ Service B ↔ Database

Use deployment diagram showing runtime structure.


Tips

Understand Before Diagramming

  • Read the code, don't guess
  • Trace actual execution paths
  • Verify assumptions with code inspection

Choose Right Level of Detail

  • Executive overview: High-level components only
  • Developer docs: Show classes/modules
  • Implementation guide: Show methods/functions

Keep It Current

  • Update diagrams when code changes
  • Include diagram generation date
  • Link diagrams to specific code versions/commits

Make It Useful

  • Diagrams should answer questions
  • Diagrams should reveal structure
  • Diagrams should not just be pretty pictures

# Supported AI Coding Agents

This skill is compatible with the SKILL.md standard and works with all major AI coding agents:

Learn more about the SKILL.md standard and how to use these skills with your preferred AI coding agent.