Refactor high-complexity React components in Dify frontend. Use when `pnpm analyze-component...
npx skills add TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit --skill "make-arch-diag"
Install specific skill from multi-skill repository
# Description
Generate architecture diagram for a specific component or system. Prompts user to select which area to document, then creates comprehensive mermaid diagrams.
# SKILL.md
name: make-arch-diag
description: Generate architecture diagram for a specific component or system. Prompts user to select which area to document, then creates comprehensive mermaid diagrams.
Make-Arch-Diag: Architecture Diagram Generation
Creates comprehensive architecture diagrams for selected components or systems using mermaid syntax.
When to Use
- Documenting a new feature or component
- Updating architecture documentation after changes
- Onboarding new team members
- Explaining complex system interactions
- Before making significant architectural changes
Critical Constraints
ALWAYS:
- Ask user which component/system to diagram
- Use the /mermaid skill for diagram creation
- Include multiple views (data flow, component structure, sequence diagrams)
- Save diagrams to temp/make-arch-diag/{component-name}/
- Use consistent color coding across all diagrams
NEVER:
- Create diagrams without understanding the code
- Skip reading the actual implementation
- Use generic placeholder names
- Create diagrams that contradict the code
Workflow
Step 1: Component Selection
Ask the user which area they want diagrammed:
Which component or system would you like to diagram?
Examples:
- Authentication system
- Database layer
- API endpoints
- Message queue processing
- State management
- Specific feature (e.g., "user registration flow")
Please specify the component/system:
Step 2: Scope Definition
Based on user input, determine:
- Boundaries: What's in scope vs out of scope
- Level of Detail: High-level architecture vs detailed implementation
- Audience: Developers, architects, stakeholders
Step 3: Code Exploration
Investigate the codebase:
- Find entry points (main, CLI, API routes)
- Trace execution flows
- Identify components and their relationships
- Map data flows
- Document external dependencies
Step 4: Diagram Types Selection
Choose appropriate diagram types:
Component Diagram (Always include)
- Shows major components and their relationships
- Good for: Understanding system structure
Data Flow Diagram (Include if data transformation is central)
- Shows how data moves through the system
- Good for: Understanding pipelines, ETL, processing
Sequence Diagram (Include if interactions are complex)
- Shows step-by-step execution flow
- Good for: Understanding request/response, async operations
State Diagram (Include if state management is central)
- Shows states and transitions
- Good for: Understanding lifecycle, workflows
Deployment Diagram (Include for infrastructure docs)
- Shows how system is deployed
- Good for: Understanding runtime environment
Step 5: Create Diagrams
Use /mermaid skill to create each diagram:
- Follow standard color palette
- Include legends
- Add clear labels and descriptions
- Group related components in subgraphs
Step 6: Write Architecture Description
Create temp/make-arch-diag/{component}/architecture.md:
# {Component} Architecture
## Overview
[2-3 paragraph overview of the component]
## Diagrams
### Component Structure
[Embed component diagram]
### Data Flow
[Embed data flow diagram]
### Sequence Diagrams
[Embed sequence diagrams for key operations]
## Components
### Component 1: {Name}
- **Purpose**: [What it does]
- **Responsibilities**: [What it's responsible for]
- **Dependencies**: [What it depends on]
- **Interface**: [How others interact with it]
### Component 2: {Name}
[Repeat for each component]
## Key Flows
### Flow 1: {Operation}
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Step 3]
### Flow 2: {Operation}
[Repeat for each key operation]
## Design Decisions
### Decision 1: {Topic}
- **Context**: [Why this decision was needed]
- **Options Considered**: [Alternatives]
- **Chosen**: [What was chosen]
- **Rationale**: [Why]
- **Tradeoffs**: [Costs and benefits]
## Constraints and Invariants
- [Constraint 1]
- [Constraint 2]
- [Invariant 1]
- [Invariant 2]
## Extension Points
- [Where/how to extend functionality]
## Related Documentation
- [Links to other architecture docs]
- [Links to API documentation]
- [Links to design documents]
Example: Authentication System
Component Diagram
%%{init: {'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 50, 'rankSpacing': 60}}}%%
graph TB
classDef handler fill:#e65100,stroke:#ffb74d,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
classDef stateNode fill:#004d40,stroke:#4db6ac,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
classDef integration fill:#c62828,stroke:#ef9a9a,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
classDef output fill:#00695c,stroke:#4db6ac,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
subgraph API ["API Layer"]
Login["/login endpoint<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>POST credentials"]
Refresh["/refresh endpoint<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>POST refresh token"]
Logout["/logout endpoint<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>POST token"]
end
subgraph Auth ["Authentication Service"]
AuthService["AuthService<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>authenticate()<br/>generate_token()<br/>verify_token()"]
TokenManager["TokenManager<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>create_access_token()<br/>create_refresh_token()<br/>validate_token()"]
end
subgraph Storage ["Data Layer"]
UserDB[(User Database)]
TokenCache[(Token Cache<br/>Redis)]
end
Login --> AuthService
Refresh --> TokenManager
Logout --> TokenManager
AuthService --> UserDB
AuthService --> TokenManager
TokenManager --> TokenCache
class Login,Refresh,Logout handler;
class UserDB,TokenCache stateNode;
class AuthService,TokenManager integration;
Color Legend:
| Color | Category | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Orange | Handler | API endpoints |
| Teal | State | Data storage |
| Red | Integration | Service components |
Sequence Diagram: Login Flow
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API as /login endpoint
participant Auth as AuthService
participant DB as User Database
participant TM as TokenManager
participant Cache as Redis
Client->>API: POST /login {username, password}
API->>Auth: authenticate(username, password)
Auth->>DB: query user by username
DB-->>Auth: User record
Auth->>Auth: verify password hash
alt Valid credentials
Auth->>TM: generate_tokens(user_id)
TM->>Cache: store refresh token
Cache-->>TM: OK
TM-->>Auth: {access_token, refresh_token}
Auth-->>API: Success + tokens
API-->>Client: 200 OK + tokens
else Invalid credentials
Auth-->>API: AuthenticationError
API-->>Client: 401 Unauthorized
end
Data Flow Diagram
%%{init: {'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 40, 'rankSpacing': 50}}}%%
flowchart LR
classDef phase fill:#6a1b9a,stroke:#ba68c8,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
classDef handler fill:#e65100,stroke:#ffb74d,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
classDef output fill:#00695c,stroke:#4db6ac,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
Input["Credentials<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>username<br/>password"]
subgraph Processing
Hash["Hash Password<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>bcrypt"]
Compare["Compare<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>stored vs provided"]
Generate["Generate Tokens<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>JWT + Refresh"]
end
Output["Response<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>access_token<br/>refresh_token<br/>expires_in"]
Input --> Hash --> Compare --> Generate --> Output
class Input phase;
class Hash,Compare,Generate handler;
class Output output;
Color Legend:
| Color | Category | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Purple | Phase | Input/stages |
| Orange | Handler | Processing steps |
| Dark Teal | Output | Final output |
Diagram Best Practices
1. Component Diagrams
- Group related components in subgraphs
- Show only direct dependencies (avoid clutter)
- Use consistent colors for component types
- Label interfaces/contracts
2. Data Flow Diagrams
- Flow left-to-right or top-to-bottom
- Show transformations clearly
- Indicate data format at each stage
- Highlight validation points
3. Sequence Diagrams
- Include all actors/systems
- Show both success and error paths
- Annotate with actual function/method names
- Include timing constraints if relevant
4. State Diagrams
- Show all valid states
- Show all valid transitions
- Annotate transitions with trigger conditions
- Highlight error/terminal states
Common Patterns to Diagram
Layered Architecture
Presentation Layer → Business Logic Layer → Data Access Layer
Use component diagram with horizontal layers.
Pipeline Architecture
Input → Stage 1 → Stage 2 → Stage 3 → Output
Use data flow diagram showing transformations.
Event-Driven Architecture
Event Source → Event Bus → Handlers → Side Effects
Use sequence diagram showing event flow.
Microservices Architecture
Service A ↔ API Gateway ↔ Service B ↔ Database
Use deployment diagram showing runtime structure.
Tips
Understand Before Diagramming
- Read the code, don't guess
- Trace actual execution paths
- Verify assumptions with code inspection
Choose Right Level of Detail
- Executive overview: High-level components only
- Developer docs: Show classes/modules
- Implementation guide: Show methods/functions
Keep It Current
- Update diagrams when code changes
- Include diagram generation date
- Link diagrams to specific code versions/commits
Make It Useful
- Diagrams should answer questions
- Diagrams should reveal structure
- Diagrams should not just be pretty pictures
# Supported AI Coding Agents
This skill is compatible with the SKILL.md standard and works with all major AI coding agents:
Learn more about the SKILL.md standard and how to use these skills with your preferred AI coding agent.